Talk:Władysław Szpilman/Archive 1

Introduction
Presently, the introduction reads:


 * ... He is best known as the protagonist of the Roman Polański film The Pianist, based on Szpilman's autobiographical book recounting how he survived World War Two.

Given the fact that Szpilman spent the better part of the War hiding from the Germans (for obvious reasons), would it not be more accurate to change this to "... how he survived the Holocuast" or perhaps even "... how he survived the Second World War and the Holocaust"? It just seems to me that this phrase doesn't properly describe his plight as a Jew under Nazi occupation. --Todeswalzer 01:03, 23 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Good call! “...How he survived the Holocaust and the Second World War” would be far better. But now I notice one other problem: The notion that he is best known the the protagonist in the film. Maybe that’s what he’s best known for outside Europe or Poland, but it certainly isn’t what he was best known for in Poland. Perhaps this should be adjusted too. Jim_Lockhart 15:33, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

"Władek"
Deleted, because 'Władek' was not Szpilman's nickname nor pseudonym. Władek is just a common diminutive of a popular Polish male name 'Władysław'. Every Władysław will be called 'Władek' by his friends and family. Regards, Piotr (Piotrek for friends and family) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.78.252.25 (talk) 01:27, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Jewish police accusations
It is coming to light from many sources that Szpilman was member of the Jewish police in the ghetto. This accusations are from author Agata Tuszynska. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.16.134.159 (talk) 01:23, 2 November 2010 (UTC)


 * This is lie, slander and libel! A nazi language! Who says that? Gossip by Polish and german neonazis and antisemits? Plaes caution!
 * It is already well known, that with the sentence by courts in Hamburg/Germany in May 2013 it is wrong and forbidden to the german publisher of the book by polish author A. tuszynska to suggest such lies and libels as baseless. Agata Tuszynska itself is at the present time litigated in Warsaw and Hamburg. More informations and documents: www.veragran.com and www.agatatuszynska.info


 * It's more complicated. Statment by Szpilman's son from 2010 says more about the accusations and it's origins: http://izrael.org.il/opinie/802-owiadcz

Inconsistency
"Career as a pianist" section says that "Szpilman and his family did not need to find a new residence since their flat was already in the ghetto area". "Survival during the Holocaust" section says that "Szpilman and his family ... were forced to move into a "Jewish District" known as the Warsaw Ghetto on October 31, 1940". Isn't that self-contradictory? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.246.185.158 (talk) 19:19, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Serious issues with the sections during WWII
From PRIMARY:


 * Policy: Unless restricted by another policy, primary sources that have been reliably published may be used in Wikipedia; but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them.[4] Any interpretation of primary source material requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation. A primary source may only be used on Wikipedia to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the source but without further, specialized knowledge. For example, an article about a novel may cite passages to describe the plot, but any interpretation needs a secondary source. Do not analyze, synthesize, interpret, or evaluate material found in a primary source yourself; instead, refer to reliable secondary sources that do so. Do not base an entire article on primary sources, and be cautious about basing large passages on them. Do not add unsourced material from your personal experience, because that would make Wikipedia a primary source of that material. Use extra caution when handling primary sources about living people; see WP:BLPPRIMARY, which is policy.

The problem with this article is that the main source is his personal memoir. Memoirs are fine, but they should be presented as such. It's an easy problem to solve, just add "According to Szpilman's memoir..." where appropriate. --Quasipalm (talk) 02:18, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Władysław Szpilman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070925182028/http://www.ushmm.org/museum/exhibit/focus/pianist/ to http://www.ushmm.org/museum/exhibit/focus/pianist/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:56, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Untitled
Szpilman's book was certainly published in Poland after the war, however not in the full version. I don't think it is clearly said in the article. --Martewa 18:13, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)


 * What he published after the war was not the same version that was published many years later, but I think the narrative was the same. About my statement that the new version (1998) was not yet published in Polish, I just wrote what my copy (in swedish) said, I'm sorry about that. [[User:Sverdrup|❝Sverdrup❞ ]] 18:50, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)