Talk:W. Brown & Associates

Untitled
I think this article contains valuable information, uses references from unbiased, legitimate sources, and is stated in a neutral point of view. I'd like to keep the page up, so anyone who disagrees, please provide feedback as to why you disagree and your suggestions to improve it. (Jpenglis (talk) 15:40, 12 July 2010 (UTC))

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
 * This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
 * There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
 * It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
 * In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:48, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Orphan article message
JoeNMLC (talk) 01:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)