Talk:WASP-44b/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: – Quadell (talk) 15:04, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomitator: User:Starstriker7


 * 1a: Which is better? "Jupiter-size planet" or "Jupiter-sized planet"? ("You want me to Jupiter-size that for just thirty-five cents more?)
 * Haha. XD All fixed. --Starstriker7(Talk) 00:01, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1a: In the lede, the orbital period sentence seem to split up a couple of sentences about the planets discovery. Would in be better elsewhere in the lede?
 * I've done plenty of re-arranging and a small add. How does it look? --Starstriker7(Talk) 00:12, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1a: "searched the night sky for transits" is a bit lingo-ish. It's better to explain, which will probably involve splitting the sentence.
 * All set to go. --Starstriker7(Talk) 00:12, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1a: "This notice came about" is a little odd. "This was discovered", maybe?
 * "This was discovered" didn't seem to fit quite right, so I tried something different. How does it look? --Starstriker7(Talk) 00:01, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1a: I don't know what "the most honest solution" means.
 * I gave a clarification a shot. How does it look? --Starstriker7(Talk) 00:08, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1b: See Talk:WASP-44/GA1 for discussion about the navbox.


 * 1b: The category "Hot Jupiters" is in the category "Gas Giants". Is there some reason this article should have both categories? If not, just keep the "Hot Jupiters" one. Similarly, should a planet be in the "Cetus constellation" category?
 * Well, it is in the Cetus constellation, so I'd say it should. I'll nix the Gas giant category momentarily.
 * 2b: There's an accuracy tag in the "Other designations" section of the infobox, and discussion on the talk page about it.
 * All dealt with. --Starstriker7(Talk) 00:08, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 6b: You know me -- I like pictures. They're pretty.
 * And, in this case, big and metal and shiny also! :D --Starstriker7(Talk) 00:08, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, that's the coolest one yet, for real. – Quadell (talk) 03:04, 27 August 2011 (UTC)