Talk:WAXN-TV

Faw Ownership
The following text was on the article:
 * Faw thought about an appeal, but was advised to sell the station rather than risk having his license stripped. He finally sold channel 64 to a Kannapolis businessman in 1996.  The new owner changed the calls to WAXN-TV and secured a local marketing agreement with WSOC-TV.  Cox bought the station outright in 2000.

I don't know anything about troubles Faw may have had with the FCC but many other details just don't mesh. When Cox bought WAXN in 2000 it was still owned by Reverend Faw (technically known as "Kannapolis Televison") so who is the unidentified businessman who was mentioned as a middle owner? Also, it was definitely Cox Enterprises who changed the call letters under the terms of the LMA agreement.

Fair use rationale for Image:Waxn2.gif
Image:Waxn2.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:28, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Waxn1.jpg
Image:Waxn1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:29, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on WAXN-TV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120905124201/http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2010/06/12/1494501/more-news-shows-coming-in-the.html to http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2010/06/12/1494501/more-news-shows-coming-in-the.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:39, 20 July 2016 (UTC)