Talk:WBCB (The CW Plus)

Is this WB 100+?
User:Rwn3rd removed this station from The WB 100+ Station Group and both the article itself and the Business Journal article linked to suggest it might not be WB 100+. Should we move this page to someplace else, and if so, where? And for that matter, why does this page have a disambiguation title? (Feel free to bolt this talk page if Rwn3rd moves it himself.) Morgan Wick 02:09, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * This is not a WB 100+ outlet. I checked the WFMJ and WTLH schedules on TitanTV (the schedule page for WTLH also lists the WFXU schedule, — WFXU is part of The WB 100+ — and WFMJ's schedule page also has WBCB's listings).  Outside of WB programming, they do not match at all -- but all WB 100+ stations have the same basic schedule.  Also, if this station were part of The WB 100+, http://www.thewbpass.com/wbpass/ns04/images/siblogos2005/wbcb.gif would have a WBCB logo similar to what WB 100+ outlets have, not a 404 Not Found error.  I agree, a move needs to be made, but I don't know where.  (A disambiguation is needed in this article's title to distinguish this station, whose "WBCB" are fake, from a radio station that is licensed with the same calls.  Oh, and yes, I know this response is a full four months after the question.) –– WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  01:41, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Wbcb.gif
Image:Wbcb.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:04, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:5273623 BG1.JPG
Image:5273623 BG1.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:01, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Suggest to merge page to WFMJ
Per essay on broadcast media notability, digital subchannels should not have their own articles, but be part of the main station's article. dhett (talk • contribs) 23:09, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose I think that there can be enough information for subchannels that separate articles can be used, the exception of course being with weather-based stations such as NBC Weather Plus.Jgera5 (talk) 18:17, 11 July 2008 (UTC)