Talk:WBDT

Fair use rationale for Image:WBDT logo.png
Image:WBDT logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:48, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Wdtn anchors.png
The image Image:Wdtn anchors.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --01:13, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Springfield/Dayton
WBDT now shares studios with WDTN in Moraine (Dayton). Studios were in Miamisburg (Dayton). City of license is Springfield, but station id's show WBDT Springfield-Dayton, with I suppose "Dayton" being parenthetical according to FCC rules. The station serves the Dayton market. Other Dayton stations identify during station id's as Dayton-Springfield (due to some long ago desire for Springfield viewers not to switch loyalties to Columbus TV). With all of this, my question is what should be listed in the Infobox Broadcast template for location, and what for city? And is there another category, not included in the template, for the area a station markets to, regardless of FCC regs. Chaswmsday (talk) 16:11, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Referencing WRGT-TV or WRGT in body
A recent edit changed body text from "WRGT-TV" to "WRGT", citing MOS that the "-TV" wording should only appear once. In fact, there is still at least one "WRGT-TV" left. I can find no such guidance in MOS, and I find mixed usage in many other TV station articles. I will restore "-TV" pending guidance otherwise. --Chaswmsday (talk) 15:54, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on WBDT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141219194453/http://www.mediageneral.com/press/2014/dec19_14_merger.html to http://www.mediageneral.com/press/2014/dec19_14_merger.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130829004251/http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf to http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:57, 6 January 2018 (UTC)