Talk:WCPN/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: OliveYouBean (talk · contribs) 03:41, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

G'day! Seeing as this article's been waiting so long I figure I'll have a go at reviewing it. Hopefully shouldn't take too long. :) OliveYouBean (talk) 03:41, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

I'll have a look at 1b when I get the chance tomorrow. The fair use rationales are the only thing I'm super worried about, otherwise I'm sure this article can be promoted pretty quickly. Thanks for all your hard work on this! OliveYouBean (talk) 04:55, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi!!! I just started a new job this week but I'm ready to go! Thank you for the review! You might have also noticed there's a bit more info, turns out that The Morning Journal pre-2000 archives got added to NewsBank between the time I made the nomination up to today. As IABot is still not working properly, I manually archived them all. Also tweaked the lede as it felt it could be improved on a bit. Nathan Obral • he/him • t  •  c  • 03:49, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
 * 1a: Fixed. :)
 * 2a: Scott is generally regarded as a subject matter expert, particularly in television and radio.
 * 6b: Those non-free logos actually date back to before my rewrite; in the case of the second logo, it was in the infobox prior to my rewrite being ported over in late March. Both were removed. :)


 * Thanks for the reply! I've been pretty busy with work too, but should be able to do a bit more on this tomorrow. Hopefully we're almost done here. OliveYouBean (talk) 09:13, 2 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the patience with all the edits (and additional content) I put in! These outstanding items should be tidied up:
 * 1b: I found Len's comment and put it in instead. Trying to paraphrase it wasn't lending the same impact the direct quote offered.
 * Re: Palmer - fixed. Reread the article, it was not framed as a claim.
 * Redid that with "commented" and to better contextualize things.
 * "the current WMTX" works for me.
 * 6: My rationale was in the mind of contextual significance, but this is a good point. I removed the picture, if it works better without, I can just get the image speedy deleted.
 * Hopefully these edits help! Have a good weekend. Nathan Obral • he/him • t  •  c  • 06:33, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Courtesy pinging for @OliveYouBean. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 19:26, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply and changes. I'm happy with everything now, so going to promote the article. Great job on it! OliveYouBean (talk) 08:26, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for all of your help and input, ! Do have a great day! Nathan Obral • he/him • t  •  c  • 17:37, 4 December 2022 (UTC)