Talk:WEKA-LD

Really...
How much more information can be added about an -LD station that's been on the air for a couple of months?

That tag is really unneeded, as saying this article is incomplete is like saying a biography of a 3-year old is incomplete... how much more CAN be sensibly added?

Vjmlhds (talk) 23:05, 8 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Yes, really. At first glance, there's still plenty of work to do.  Lack of sources, lack of content, lack of incoming links (beyond those transcluded from the Cleveland TV template), etc.  Overall, a pretty bare-bones draft, even for a stub.   Levdr1 lp  /  talk  16:21, 9 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Then we get into the question of how much is "just right". You could put that template on every single article on Wikipedia if you wanted to if you didn't think there was enough there (not you personally, but metaphorically).  Those kind of templates are awfully subjective, and should really only be used in glaring cases. Vjmlhds (talk) 16:53, 9 May 2016 (UTC)


 * - Two sentences & two references, one of which is duplicated in the external links sections. If licensed broadcast stations weren't basically considered notable by default, I'd nominate this at AfD.  Even w/ the claimed lack of available sources, there are plenty of standard improvements which could be made to this article, and yet there's been no attempt whatsoever to rework it.  I've restored the improvement tag to this stub accordingly.   Levdr1 lp  /  talk  17:24, 11 May 2016 (UTC)