Talk:WKSU/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: ThadeusOfNazereth (talk · contribs) 04:35, 12 December 2022 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Hello! I will be reviewing this article and will update this template when the review is completed. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 04:35, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: I am happy to promote this article! It's comprehensive in its scope and history and is well sourced throughout. My only comment relates to the liberal use of semicolons (which I despise) but they all look grammatically correct and I won't hold up a good article simply because of personal preference.
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: I am happy to promote this article! It's comprehensive in its scope and history and is well sourced throughout. My only comment relates to the liberal use of semicolons (which I despise) but they all look grammatically correct and I won't hold up a good article simply because of personal preference.
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall: I am happy to promote this article! It's comprehensive in its scope and history and is well sourced throughout. My only comment relates to the liberal use of semicolons (which I despise) but they all look grammatically correct and I won't hold up a good article simply because of personal preference.
 * Pass/Fail: