Talk:WLLZ (FM)

This statement IS a neutral point of view!
Someone (who probably works at clear channel) keeps deleting the following statement the wikipedia page:

"Clear channel has put very little effort into promoting the station. Radio insiders believe the station only has a country format to steal as many listeners as possible from WYCD, which was starting to challenge Clear Channel's adult contemporary WNIC in revenue and ratings."

This is a TRUE statement. It is harsh, but true. It is also from a neutral point of view.

Could the next person who deletes this section please describe in detail (in more than just a few letters or words) why this section is deleted. It is important for people to know the truth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.229.114.90 (talk) 19:32, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It's quite a simple explanation. You can claim it's true all you want, but unless you have a source for your statement, not only is it original research, it can only appear to be from a non-neutral point of view. Provide a reference, and it can stay. Otherwise, it's no more than an unsourced attack. JPG-GR (talk) 05:41, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

I finally have a reference for the statement, which means it is no longer original research, and it is no longer an unsourced attack. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.229.114.182 (talk) 18:50, 24 June 2008 (UTC)