Talk:WPST-TV/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Red-tailed hawk (talk · contribs) 00:22, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

I'll take a look-see. It may take a bit to get familiar with all of the 100+ sources, so this might take a bit to get through fully. I'll note issues as I encounter them by stating them in the table below. — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 00:22, 21 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The 1b–2c issue has been fixed by removing the "best known for" part. The 3a issue has been fixed with several ex parte mentions in the lead and body. Still figuring out the issues on 4, though I did tweak the area you mentioned from "refuted" to "challenged". Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 04:00, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Regarding 4: Richard A. Mack's inclusion in the article is problematic as 1) the majority of the scandal wound up focusing on him over anyone else on the FCC and 2) he actually faced trial twice over the license awarding. He probably should merit an article of his own if but to alleviate the undue weight (I understand had offered a similar solution).Nathan Obral • he/him •  t  •  c  • 04:36, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Noted. I will await further edits consistent with these observations. — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 22:59, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Any updates on this front? — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 23:57, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * @Red-tailed hawk @Nathan Obral Just made my first attempt at trying to trim the Mack scandal section. It's tough. The whole thing coming to light led to Mack's high-profile resignation (the fact that an exclusive came from The Minneapolis Tribune, far from Miami, might indicate the level of scandal), revealed a pattern of improper activity at the FCC, and of course the license denial. I've tried to keep anything relevant to a) the channel 10 case, b) NAL, and c) large implications that would be omissions if not included (e.g. pressure for Mack's resignation). Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 04:35, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi @Red-tailed hawk, is there any update as to this? Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 02:02, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I had taken your above comment as asking Nathan if he had any comment. I'll take a look at the updates. — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 03:03, 10 April 2023 (UTC)