Talk:WRFK (defunct)

The tone is inappropriate? The only thing I could think of in re-reading it was about the seminary selling the frequency, which was only a reasonable move considering the fiduciary responsibilities of the trustees. Please elaborate about what is wrong, so it can be modified in response. Thanks Vaoverland 23:04, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

I agree with Vaoverland - the tone looks fine to me. What is wrong here? Calliopejen 23:01, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

I concur with the above two posters, when reading through it I only had to make some clarification, punctuation, and organization edits. The tone seemed fine. I am removing the tone cleanup template. However, I think that the last sentence in the article seems somewhat out of place. IMHO, it either needs to be expanded, moved to another part of the article, or removed. Since I'm unsure about it, I'm just going to leave it be. -- John Wyandson 03:34, 7 November 2005 (UTC)