Talk:WSJ Magazine/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Good article nomination on hold
This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of September 26, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: A few run-on sentences and misuse of fragments/commas, etc. Some sentences could be copyedited/broken apart a bit. The very first sentence of the article is one example. The WP:LEAD is not really a summary of the entire article itself, rather it's just a few sentences about the magazine.
 * I think I got them all.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 00:47, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout. One minor thing, one redlink among the cites, that could be fixed. Passes here.
 * Got it.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 22:39, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: Not thorough. What about how the magazine was initially received? Success in sales? Was the first issue critiqued by other journalists? Praised? There should be at least a whole subsection discussing this.
 * It was essentially given away so sales is not a significant factor here. Journalistic content was not critiqued as much as the business model.  I have added information to that effect.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 00:27, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Appears to be written from a neutral perspective. Passes here.
 * 5. Article stability? No issues at all in the article history or talk page. Passes here.
 * 6. Images?: One image used, fair use rationale provided on the image page. Passes here.

Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. Cirt (talk) 07:54, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Reevaluation
GA passed. Nice work. Cirt (talk) 03:30, 27 September 2008 (UTC)