Talk:WSPQ

Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the acronym for an online political test is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the website. - Dravecky (talk) 22:42, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Wspqlogo.gif
Image:Wspqlogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 19:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Has the station fallen upon hard times?
The website gives the physical address of the station and nothing more. The webcast link on the website gives "file not found". The webcast link in the info box links to nothing. Perhaps the station is now an automated jukebox relaying music from the sky and the extensive programming info in the article is no longer valid? Could someone who in within the listening area shed some light as to what is going on? I remember this station as being a valuable station worth listening to via its webcast.1archie99 (talk) 17:40, 5 June 2010 (UTC)