Talk:WTF?!

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved. NW ( Talk ) 15:24, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

WTF?! (album) → WTF?! — It's a new album coming out by notable band KMFDM, and there's no need to disambiguate it, as it has exactly that punctuation. WTF?! is blacklisted, however, so I couldn't move it myself. —Torchiest talkedits 23:06, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Object this should have a discussion. Particularly since the target is also a common expression, so should probably redirect to WTF. 65.93.13.210 (talk) 05:30, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I feel that the additional punctuation is specific enough to permit using the name with any disambiguation. Otherwise, it seems like we'll need to start redirecting a bunch of extra article titles, just to cover any extra punctuation combinations we can imagine, e.g. WTF!?, WTF??, WTF???, WTF!!!, etc.  A simple hat note at the top of the album article could point to the disambiguation page. —Torchiest talkedits 17:54, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Megadittos. 24.177.123.74 (talk) 05:55, 24 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Opposed uncontroversial move at requested moves - request and oppose taken from that page. Dpmuk (talk) 11:20, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Agree with move. The punctuation is specific enough that the article can be on its own without the disambig of "(album)". If we can have articles that differ only by a capital letter, then this specific punctuation should be no problem. I agree with putting in a hatnote redirecting to WTF, if someone really types in "WTF?!" and doesn't mean this album (unlikely, but possible), then they'll get to where they're trying to go. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 18:32, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Soft oppose move. Regardless of specific punctuation variations, title is too generic in my opinion to stand alone without disambiguation. And this is personal taste, but I typically prefer title disambiguation to in-article hatnotes and dab links. However, it wouldn't be the end of the world for the article to be at either location. –Fierce Beaver (talk) 18:56, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Agree with move. Articles differing only by capitalization aren't generally parenthetically explained, and this is more distinct than a capitalization clash. 24.177.123.74 (talk) 05:54, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

"Rebels in Control"
Would it be a good idea to add "Rebels in Control" to the list of singles in the infobox? It was something of a online release, and it was downloaded quite a bit, and the online version was not the same as the album version. It seems like it might be notable enough to promote to that list, if not necessarily its own article. —Torchiest talkedits 03:43, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't think so, it wasn't ever released as a single, just a free download. Maybe if it charted somewhere that could be mentioned here though. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 04:41, 26 July 2012 (UTC)