Talk:WTF/Archive 1

Windows Technology Framework
Google shows essentially no hits for this - I think it's spurious. --Air 15:19, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

Witness the Fitness
Living in Britain, I've never heard this. Google only appears to think that "Witness the Fitness" is (1) the name of a band and (2) the name of a track by Roots Manuva. I think this is bogus. --Mayrel 18:13, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah, I totally agree, there is no way in hell that the letters WTF could EVER stand for (W)hat (T)he (F)uck. -Damien Vryce 17:24, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Look at the section title. He's not talking about all the meanings of WTF, only about proposed "Witness the Fitness" acronym. 212.200.52.11 19:16, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Space between end of word and paranthesis?
In the last bullet, the paranthesis ends with a large space. Why is that?

Weak To Fit
The word WTF stands for Weak To Fit

What the fuck!?
I'm tired of people giving the idea that military slang was originally Internet slang. First off, Whiskey Tango Foxtrot is from the Nato Phonetical Alphabet. This is MILITARY. This is another example of military slang becoming Internet slang but people being completely ignorant of its etymology. I fixed this because it gives people the wrong impression. --Amada 02:49, 08 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Misinformation is misinformation. It's good that it's been fixed. D Boland 03:27, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

What the fuck is being discussed
And I highly encourage EVERYONE to post their opinions here. Thanks. TheBlazikenMaster 21:39, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Collaboration between Deadmau5, Tommy Lee, DJ Aero, and Steve Duda
Collaberation between Deadmau5, Tommy Lee, DJ Aero, and Steve Duda.

Newest addition as of now (?)
The newest addition to the list as of right now is "Wasn't That Funny (TLC)"

While this may be a perfectly acceptable explanation of the acronym "WTF", I am wondering what TLC is.

Google's "Define:" tool gives multiple explanations from R&B groups and internet alliancess to sitcoms and church movements.

Please elaborate this acronym, since I think that it is unnecesary to need looking up one acronym while looking up another acronym to understand the definition of the first acronym. If you can follow me. Bobber0001 (talk) 18:13, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * But I think you're missing the point of "disambiguation". These aren't dictionaries or acronym thesauruses, they are pages geared towards helping people find the articles they're looking for, when the search terms can mean many different things. If your new additions still exist in a few days time, without links to existing Wikipedia articles, I'll probably come back and delete them. WikHead (talk) 18:31, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, pardon me Bobber0001, I misunderstood. I thought you were saying that you were the user who just added those acronyms. It seems clear now, that we were both agreeing to the same thing all along. Please accept my apologies. WikHead (talk) 20:18, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I was like "what the fuck" (shitty pun totally intended) when I read your first paragraph, but your second paragraph made it all clear. Apology accepted. (Is it a custom to keep adding ":"'s when you reply to something on a talk page? Help me learn! Bobber0001 (talk) 22:05, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Fake entries
Not long ago this article was completely revised, and it needed that. The article was literally littered with a vast amount of "fake" entries, with little or no practical usage. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, nor is it its job to list every possible lettering of an acronym. "WTF" could mean so many different things, and only the most used and important should be listed here. I just removed yet another entry, "Wearying Train Findings", which does not make any sense, nor give any hits when searced for on google. Please do not add random purposeless entries, I cannot stress this enough. Just because you might've heard about something with the acronym WTF does not mean that it has to be listed here. The most important explanations of the acronym is already listed, and unless agreed upon, none probably needs to be added. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobber0001 (talk • contribs) 09:11, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

People are STILL adding pointless entries. I just removed an entry concerning a specific column in a specific blog. The entry even contained a dead internal link to the blog's uncreated page on Wikipedia. I have to say it again: do not add pointless entries that are outside of the scope of Wikipedia. It is annoying to remove three pointless entries every week, it clutters the article, and it makes it more difficult to find relevant information. Bobber0001 (talk) 19:10, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Want To Fuck?
"wtf" can also say want to fuck?


 * Yes, it can, but Wikipedia's mission isn't to list every single possible sentence that can be constructed with the three letters in a given acronym. There are other sites out there that does that. Try urbandictionary.com if you are looking for definitions of slang terms and acronyms. Bobber0001 (talk) 18:00, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

And it can also mean Who's that fool!?67.219.227.73 (talk) 20:10, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Unix utility wtf
Just found it when typed "wtf" in the Unix shell. It's an acronym lookup tool. WTF? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.213.57.70 (talk) 22:01, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Webkit component
WTF is a component in Webkit project. Previously this component was known as KXMLCore. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.213.57.70 (talk) 22:01, 15 December 2008 (UTC)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.80.48.175 (talk)

Redirect
A discussion at Talk:W.T.F. (the talk page for the South Park episode) involves discussion about redirects, moves, this disamb page and whatnot and might be of some interest. -  SoSaysChappy   (talk)  05:23, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

World Time Format
Can someone add a link under "World Time Format" pointing to www.worldtimeformat.com or, better yet, create a wiki entry for World Time Format and point it to that? World Time Format is a new internet format for recording datestamps and telling time, using letters instead of numbers. John Howard (MA) (talk) 18:17, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

WikiLeaks Task Force
WikiLeaks Task Force.

CIA to examine impact of files recently released by WikiLeaks

Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post. By Greg Miller Washington Post Staff Writer Wednesday, December 22, 2010

The CIA has launched a task force to assess the impact of the exposure of thousands of U.S. diplomatic cables and military files by WikiLeaks.

Officially, the panel is called the WikiLeaks Task Force. But at CIA headquarters, it's mainly known by its all-too-apt acronym: W.T.F.

The irreverence is perhaps understandable for an agency that has been relatively unscathed by WikiLeaks. Only a handful of CIA files have surfaced on the WikiLeaks Web site, and records from other agencies posted online reveal remarkably little about CIA employees or operations.

Even so, CIA officials said the agency is conducting an extensive inventory of the classified information that is routinely distributed on a dozen or more networks that connect agency employees around the world.

And the task force is focused on the immediate impact of the recently released files. One issue is whether the agency's ability to recruit informants could be damaged by declining confidence in the U.S. government's ability to keep secrets. ad_icon Click here!

"The director asked the task force to examine whether the latest release of WikiLeaks documents might affect the agency's foreign relationships or operations," CIA spokesman George Little said. The panel is being led by the CIA's Counterintelligence Center but has more than two dozen members from departments across the agency.

To some agency veterans, WikiLeaks has vindicated the CIA's long-standing aversion to sharing secrets with other government agencies, a posture criticized after it was identified as contributing to the nation's failure to prevent the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

Even while moving to share more information, the agency "has not capitulated to this business of making everything available to outsiders," said a former high-ranking CIA official who recently retired. "They don't even make everything available to insiders. And by and large the system has worked."

As recently as two years ago, the agency rejected a request to make more of its intelligence reports available on the SIPRNET, the classified network used by the Pentagon to pass information around the world.

"We simply said we weren't going to do it," another former CIA official said. "The consensus was there were simply too many people potentially who had access."

The former officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren't authorized to discuss agency security measures.

Among those people with access to SIPRNET was a low-level U.S. Army intelligence analyst, Bradley E. Manning, who has been charged with disclosing classified information and is suspected of using a simple thumb drive to steal the files that were sent to WikiLeaks.

The CIA has had its own computer scandals. Security clearances for former CIA director John Deutch were suspended in the late 1990s after he was accused of keeping classified information on his computer at home.

Officials said the agency also has had difficulty keeping track of laptops sent to overseas stations, as well as sensitive information shared with thousands of contractors.

The agency employs software measures to minimize the chance of a WikiLeaks-like leak. Agency systems send warnings to administrators whenever a large amount of data is downloaded. And most of the CIA's computers are not equipped to allow the use of a removable drive.

Asked what might happen if he had inserted a thumb drive into the machine at his desk, the former senior CIA official quipped: "There would probably be a little trap door under my chair."

Even so, CIA security experts have fretted for years about the implications of moving secret information from pieces of paper to digital files that can be distributed online.

"It's just a huge vulnerability," the former high-ranking CIA officer said. "Nobody could carry out enough paper to do what WikiLeaks has done."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/21/AR2010122105498.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.84.103.47 (talk) 14:51, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

WTF is an initialism...
The first line of the article refers to WTF as an acronym, it is not, it is an initialism.

Most talk comments also incorrectly refer to WTF as an acronym as well, but not here to correct that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phricak (talk • contribs) 01:00, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * According to our article about this no one distingushies between the two. Beach drifter (talk) 01:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Winning The Future
Should BHO get a WTF link? Hcobb (talk) 15:25, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Honestly WTF
Since another WTF blog is listed, I don't see any reason not to list this popular fashion blog. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abecoffman (talk • contribs) 02:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Cleanup
I cleaned up the page according to WP:MOSDAB. Can someone explain why this is indefinitely semi-protected but the tag in the article says protection expired in 2009? WTF?! Widefox (talk) 13:50, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Edit request from 99.90.87.167, 22 September 2011
WTF is also used for Welcome To France or Went to France. Americans in France often end an email to a new colleague arriving in France ending with WTF, leaving them somewhat confused until they get it.

99.90.87.167 (talk) 05:00, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Do you have a source for this?-- Jac 16888 Talk 11:26, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Edit request from 26 October 2012
Please remove the entries Neither of these has notably been referred to as "WTF" and almost nobody would make those connections when hearing the acronym. Just because something starts with the letters W, T and F does not make it a plausible or valid entry on this page. Alternatively, I'd like to see reliable sources referring to the above examples as "WTF". --84.44.159.67 (talk) 14:52, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Winning the Future, a book by Newt Gingrich, and Barack Obama's motto for his 2012 budget
 * Work Time Fun, a video game for the PlayStation Portable
 * Good point; I've removed both of them. Nyttend (talk) 13:18, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I've restored Work Time Fun because the article clearly establishes an association with the initialism. Please at least look at the articles before removing entries for a dab page. older ≠ wiser 15:11, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh shit, you're right. Thanks for correcting it. I'm making a mental note to check first. --213.168.117.135 (talk) 15:51, 27 October 2012 (UTC)