Talk:WVBW-FM

Fair use rationale for Image:Wxmm.jpg
Image:Wxmm.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

This Station
This is one weird network, to say the least, and I'm still convinced this second format change isn't a permanent. Yeah, I'm calling shenanigans on Hot 100.5. First of all, the first shift was for classic Chinese music and today's (April 27, 2009) reformat is about contemporary hits, or as the network said, 3000 contemporary hits with no commercial breaks. In the middle of the two shifts, they said they let the beer flow and mentioned they drank too much beer in thinking about the original format shift. So, again, I'm calling shenanigans on this whole current shift, but I could be wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nemalki (talk • contribs) 17:44, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Using RadioInsight.com as a source
I do not believe that we should be using RadioInsight.com as a source in this (or any other radio-related Wikipedia article, for that matter) unless the information that is being delivered by said article can be accurately attributed to another source. As a contributor (on the Moderator side, even) to RadioInsight myself, I feel very uncomfortable with anything on that website that is speculative in nature (as the "Beer 100.5" case is) being used in an encyclopedia. --74.95.135.46 (talk) 21:13, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Most of that post on RadioInsight.com was taken from VARTV.com (a realiable source) and the other part was a simple WhoIs search. So....I reverted back to the reference from RadioInsight.  Unless you can find another reference with the same information, I think it should stay. -  NeutralHomer  •  Talk  • April 28, 2009 @ 21:41