Talk:WWE SmackDown/Archive 2

This is wrong
Why is this article called (and stylised) 'WWE Friday Night SmackDown!'? Dlae │ here  17:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Is that not the name of the show? Mshake3 (talk) 17:06, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I guess. I was thinking it should be called 'WWE SmackDown', like WWE Raw (although it's not written in upper case letters, and doesn't say Monday Night, which is now understandable when you consider the name of the show/logo and all). Speaking of which, there is no longer an exclaimation mark when SmackDown is concerned, not in text or logo - so something should definitely be done about that. It also makes articles incoherent when editors stylise it that way. Dlae  │ here  17:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Not in the logo? OK... --  bullet  proof  3:16 21:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The official name is "WWE Firday Night SmackDown!", all you have to do is watch SmackDown to see that.  TJ   Spyke   21:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Then the other article should be called 'WWE RAW'. Dlae  │ here  22:07,

2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * It is called "WWE Raw"... Gavyn Sykes (talk) 22:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * No because "RAW" is only referring to the "brand" of WWE. "Raw" is name of the "television show", like "Friday Night SmackDown!" and "Extreme Championship Wrestling". Tr U cO 93 11 TaLk / SiGn 22:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The new logo on the show now only says SmackDown, so should the title be changed accordingly? There still seems to be some confusion in WWE sources though, with the website still calling it Friday Night SmackDown! RatzaChewy (talk) 16:57, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

The oficial name of Smackdown, as of February 2006 is "WWE Friday Night Smackdown", ther is no loger a "!" in the logo, and you can't tell, by the logo, that you have t the top of the page, becuase it is nearly two years out of date! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.18.2.45 (talk) 18:50, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * How about actually watching SmackDown! for once? --  bullet  proof  3:16 19:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Woh... This changes everything. Did anyone notice anything different on this Friday's edition of SmackDown (hint, hint)? -- bullet  proof  3:16 07:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The logo no longer says "Friday Night." At the same time, the announcers still refered to it as Friday Night Smackdown. Mshake3 (talk) 19:14, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually if you notice that the SmackDown! logo DOES still say Friday Night but no longer contains the !. BUT DOES include the WWE logo before Friday Night.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crash Underride (talk • contribs) 23:09, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * That's an old logo...WAAAAYYYY before the HD change.-- bullet  proof  3:16 02:38, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Then what the hell does the new logo look like??? I don't know cuz I hardly ever watch SD!. --Cra sh U nderride  04:16, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Like this-- bullet  proof  3:16 05:08, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Commentators
I'd just like to remind people who own this page (as it is locked), that as of friday night (4TH JANUARY 2008) the commentary team will be Michael Cole and Jonathan Coachman. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.18.2.45 (talk • contribs)
 * No one "owns" this page. We know. But there is not reliable source for this. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 19:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, the page isn't locked. It's just semi-protected (meaning unregistered users and accounds less than 4 days old can't edit it) because IPs kept adding unsourced info into the article.  TJ   Spyke   21:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Check the SmackDown! page on wwe.com, and click "videos". There's your proof. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.69.184.131 (talk) 22:20, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * If you bothered to check the dates, you would see that our comments were posted long before it was official.  TJ   Spyke   22:23, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

About the set
This is bugging me, why does the photo of the Smackdown set say "June 2006-Present," when the set debuted in August of 2001? 65.189.210.173 (talk) 10:16, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Because it's not the same set that debuted in August 2001. This set includes the LED screen hanging from above (which is lowered down for ECW tapings) and no longer prominently features the stage and ramp used in it's debut and few years after it. The set in it's current form has been used since the ECW brand debuted in June 2006.-- bullet  proof  3:16 15:39, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * But that screen is not part of the Smackdown set, it's hanging independently of the set. The ramp is not part of a set, it's part of the stage; the stage and set are two different things. By that logic, the Raw page should list all of the dates that they didn't use a stage, as well as the England, Italy, Japan and Saturday Night's Main Event sets. The set itself has remained unchanged, save for the WWE logo, since 2001.65.189.210.173 (talk) 11:30, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * No, the ramp and screen ARE part of the set. Also, the date is for the rgular set, not the occasion different one they use for international trips of SNME/Supershow editions.  TJ   Spyke   23:31, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The ramp thing, I believe, is matter of opinion, so it's pretty useless to argue, and I understand what the date IS, but what I'm saying is that if, in terms of Wikipedia, removing the ramp is considered a set change for Smackdown, so should the other, complete set changes. I just think that it should be uniformly documented one way or the other, and that the date of June 2006 may be misleading to some.  Of course, this entire discussion will be null and void by next Friday. 65.189.210.173 (talk) 09:56, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The ramp and stage has been gone since mid 2003, when Los Guerreros began coming out in a car. I'm sure the date refers to when the LCD screen was removed, which was done because the ECW set was being placed there. Mshake3 (talk) 19:25, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

BTW, it should also be noted that next week, all three brands will use the same set. Mshake3 (talk) 19:25, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Best of 2007
Why is the best of 2007 considered a special episode...they do one of those every year for each show. If it to be included, then you'd have to include all the other ones they've done. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.162.117.183 (talk) 02:50, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Good point. NOthing special about that. Mshake3 (talk) 03:16, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * And to everyone who insists on keeping that show in, is that a reason this one paticular "best of" episode is included, but none of the other ones are? Mshake3 (talk) 05:03, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I think it's because we just added in the list of special episodes last year. If you have the dates for the previous ones, add them in (if not, I will look for them when I get a chance).  TJ   Spyke   08:06, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * And when creating this list of special episodes, "best of" episodes were the furthest from everyone's mind. Mshake3 (talk) 15:38, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the . Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

It is not clear to me whether there is or is not a consensus to move this page. So I have removed the edit history of WWE SmackDown so that any registered editor can move the page. If it is moved and that move is reverted then please put in another WP:RM to settle the issue.

I am not watching this page so if you need any further help from me please leave a message on my user talk page. --Philip Baird Shearer (talk) 12:36, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

WWE Friday Night SmackDown! → WWE SmackDown — WWE have finally dropped the exclamation mark last night on the logo featured on the TV show's on-screen graphics and apron. (Some of it can be seen in the new set's photos) There's now officially no reason to keep the exclamation mark. — Oakster  Talk 09:41, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.


 * Support Looks like today's episode settled it.-- bullet  proof  3:16 03:38, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 *  Support -I actually agree with Mshake, I didn't realize it but a new logo doesn't really say much about the show name.  T r  U  C o 9 31 1 03:44, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Commentators still call it Friday Night Smackdown. Note the advertisment reading prior to the Noble/Palumbo match. Mshake3 (talk) 05:22, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * ...Just like Ross and Lawler still say Monday Night Raw...-- bullet  proof  3:16 05:35, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Not during the advertising read. And considering they're reading off a sheet word-for-word during that, I'd consider those the official names. Mshake3 (talk) 05:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Do you mean when they mention sponsors? I know i've heard JR say "Monday Night RAW is brought to you by..." since JR almost always uses that name.  TJ   Spyke   05:53, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Fair enough on that. But the commentators (and even the annnouncer) sure do say "Friday Night" quite a bit. And channel listings and the CW website still havn't made any changes. So a logo change, which is pretty much the basis of all this talk, is not enough to change anything. Mshake3 (talk) 06:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * That's why I haven't voted yet, just pointing that fact out.  TJ   Spyke   06:45, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Mshake3, your arguement for keeping "Friday Night" is valid but as Bulletproof said, JR and King do the exact thing with "Monday Night Raw". Also USA Network's website lists the show as "Monday Night Raw", yet we currently have the article on WWE Raw on the basis that the logos post-1997 have nevered featured "Monday Night". -- Oakster  Talk 14:26, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Does a promo announcer ever say "Monday Night Raw?" Because at the end of Smackdown, a promo for next weeks, as the announcer said, "Friday Night Smackdown." Mshake3 (talk) 15:45, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes but those are simple promos, ECW commentators often refer to their show, ECW Tuesday Night or Tuesday Night ECW. But we still don't add it. We can't really refer to WWE.com for references, since they have yet to update their logos. -- T r  U  C o 9 31 1 16:28, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Hmmm. Mshake3 (talk) 19:35, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Like Truco said, they still havn't updated their site.-- bullet  proof  3:16 19:43, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * And how long are we to wait for that to happen? Mshake3 (talk) 20:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Well until it happens. And as you pointed out above, if we are to refer to this show as Friday Night SmackDown!, we might as well rename the ECW article to ECW on Sci-Fi. T r  U  C o 9 31 1 20:14, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Fine by me. Mshake3 (talk) 20:25, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * So you want to wait, or you want to keep it under the FNS name and rename the ECW article? Also, if we wait we may have to go ahead with the move. T r  U  C o 9 31 1 20:41, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't care. All I know is that you want the article changed based on a new logo, and that's hardly enough reason. Mshake3 (talk) 20:44, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I actually go to agree on that, so I changed my view, but if we are to go with what name WWE gives their show, then we may as well rename the ECW article, no? T r  U  C o 9 31 1 20:47, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Just because the show names are Friday Night Smackdown and Monday Night Raw doesn't mean that you have to change ECW to tuesday Night ECW, And Tazz and Joey Styles hardly ever say Tuesday Night ECW. The show names are what WWE says they are not what the logos show or what the commentators say.--$$Keeton D.$$ (talk) 21:03, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Any additional comments:


 * I don't know, there is the argument that the exclamtion point should be included per WP:COMMONNAME.  TJ   Spyke   09:46, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * If anything it should be moved to WWE SmackDown. The graphics on the screen no longer say "Friday Night". The announcers didn't even make a reference to the show with that name.-- bullet  proof  3:16 10:13, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, them made several references to the "Friday Night" aspect. Mshake3 (talk) 22:47, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't think so, The CW network lists it as Friday Night SmackDown! -- T r  U  C <font color="Black">o 9 31 1 01:54, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I did consider that but seeing as there wasn't any opening credits, I'm not exactly sure if there is an alternate logo (more or less like there was pre-HD). Hopefully next week should iron that problem out. -- Oakster  Talk 10:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Maybe this move request should wait a week?  TJ   Spyke   01:12, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

new logo?
don't we have a picture for the new SD logo debuted this week? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.40.88.109 (talk) 18:25, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't think they have released an HD logo yet. T r  U  C <font color="Black">o 9 31 1 18:38, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Logo
With the HD move, SmackDown! now has a new logo. Similar to the way ECW changed their logo. Shall we update the logo? It probably doesn't appear on the SmackDown! website, but it does appear in the intro movie for the show.-- T r  U  C <font color="Black">o 9 31 1 02:31, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * What intro? Mshake3 (talk) 03:00, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Like the introduction to the show (the opening video/them), the logo appears there. That's the reason why we changed the ECW logo.-- T r  U  C <font color="Black">o 9 31 1 03:27, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Did you even watch the show tonight? Unless they aired it in the middle somewhere, there was no intro! Mshake3 (talk) 03:32, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but go to WWE.com, and look at the SD! results and you will see a different logo, its more transparent than the current one that is in the article.-- T r  U  C <font color="Black">o 9 31 1 03:50, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * How about a URL, since the one you're describing says NOTHING about a new logo? Mshake3 (talk) 05:26, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll find it soon... -- bullet  proof  3:16 05:03, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * This is the closest one I got.. T r  U  C <font color="Black">o 9 31 1 14:08, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * That's been used on and off since the CW launched. And it's different from the new logo used on TV. Mshake3 (talk) 14:46, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh...because the other one is displayed during the cut scenes/replays and on the ring apron...but we can't get a pic since there is no new intro video... T r  U  C <font color="Black">o 9 31 1 14:54, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I thought you said the new logo appeared there. Mshake3 (talk) 14:56, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Well I thought the new one was that one in that picture, but you said that its' been used on and off. So that's not the one, but I've seen a new logo during the cut scenes/replay/and on the ring apron. T r  U  C <font color="Black">o 9 31 1 14:59, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Both logos used in the show:  Dlae  │ <font color="#666666">here  16:12, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * YES! The One in the article is the one I was talking about. Good Job NimiTize T r  U  C <font color="Black">o 9 31 1 04:25, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Uhh, that was me...-- bullet  proof  3:16 04:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Well (S)he found it first, and I see that you updated it so GOODJOB! to you 2 BULLETPROOF! (sorry for not crediting you earlier) T r  U  C <font color="Black">o 9 31 1 04:30, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you,  T r  U  C <font color="Black">o 9 31 1, although this image is similar to the ECW image, but I found it, and credit to  bullet  proof  3:16, for editing it, although I think the original one I posted up (WWE copyright of course), should stay.  N  i  m <font color:"black">i  T  i <font color:"blue">z <font color:"light red">e 02:22, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * We can't be sure that's the final logo, but it can do for now (the TitanTron video never used the "Friday Night" part IIRC).  TJ   Spyke   02:25, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I've just found a leaked fan video of the SmackDown intro on YouTube from last Tuesday's tapings. It looks like the "Friday Night" has indeed been dropped. -- Oakster  Talk 08:21, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Excellent. Could post the link here? It makes you wonder if the end of the WWE and The CW partnership had anything to do with the "Friday Night" part being dropped. -- bullet  proof  3:16 08:28, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, found it. --  bullet  proof  3:16 08:39, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * According to sources WWE had been negotiating with CW and other networks for a few weeks. I think you are right, maybe WWE thinks it can get a new network to air SmackDown on Thursdays again (although I like it being on Friday since there isn't much else on TV, while Thursday has multiple programs I like to watch), plus i'm sure international viewers didn't like hearing it called Friday Night (although they got used to it, like how people in attendance at SmackDown tapings have to hear the announcers talk about something happening "in 2 days" since they tape 3 days in advance and have to do it in mind with US TV viewers). Was it me, or does it seem like WWE slowed the SmackDown theme down for that new intro? I remember it being faster paced before.  TJ   Spyke   08:43, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The music was placed over the video during editing meaning that it wasn't the actual sound recorded. The music you heard was the old theme used before moving to Friday nights. (The one found on the "Themeaddict" CD)-- bullet  proof  3:16 08:57, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, here's the unedited video. Same old theme. -- Oakster  Talk 11:05, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

no longer on the cw
when exactly does this happen all it says on the wwe website is at the end of the season--<b style="background:Navy;color:lime">S-PAC</b><b style="color:green">54</b> 15:54, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The 2007-2008 TV Season concludes at the end of May. --  <font face="Georgia"><font color="Silver">JT  <font color="#000080">Holla! 16:11, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I think with wrestling, it goes through August or September. Mshake3 (talk) 16:40, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * thats what i was thinking but i wasn't sure <b style="background:Navy;color:lime">S-PAC</b><b style="color:green">54</b> 18:14, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * From what I understand, the two candidates that would acquire the rights to WWE SmackDown are NBC Universal, which owns USA Network, and MyNetworkTV. Are there any other candidates that would acquire the rights to WWE SmackDown? Please let me know. AdamDeanHall (talk) 21:49, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * This isn't a forum (see WP:TALK). Also, News Corporation (best known as the parent company of FOX) owns MyNetworkTV, not NBC Universal.  TJ   Spyke   00:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Uh, you missed a comma there. Mshake3 (talk) 19:54, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * From what I understand, the two candidates that would acquire the rights to WWE SmackDown are NBC Universal, which owns USA Network, and News Corporation, which owns MyNetworkTV. Are there any other candidates that would acquire the rights to WWE SmackDown? Please let me know. AdamDeanHall (talk) 14:41, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Linda McMahon was on Fox and Friends this morning on Fox News and officially announced that Smackdown had come to terms with MyNetworktv. I have not seen a link anywhere else--sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdog0613 (talk • contribs) 15:02, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * It's official, wwe.com also posted a press release announcing the deal with MyNetworkTV. This in non-Wikipedia related, but THANK GOD. I was so damn sick of the CW airing SD at midnight or Saturday so they could air a damn Yankees game instead (which was never a problem on UPN. When The WB and UPN merged, they took over the former WB affiliate in my area and the WB affiliate here airs New York Yankees baseball games. MyNetworkTV took over the old UPN affiliate. This will also let more people watch here since in my area The CW is a cable channel while MyNetworkTV is a basic TV channel).  TJ   Spyke   16:03, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

can't make a change
I was trying to change the line saying that Smackdown got it's current set (the fist) on such and such date, but that's no longer accurate since the switch to HD...but it won't let me, it says I'm trying to put spam on the page...so somebody should do this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.124.4.220 (talk) 22:09, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The problem was not your fault, and was from the fact the Wrestling Information Archive is now blacklisted. It's all fixed now, thanks for telling. -- Oakster  Talk 22:39, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Theme song
Does anyone know the name of the theme song? Rdrgz25 (talk) 00:59, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Its in the article, Rise Up 2006. Please do not use Wikipedia as a forum.-- T r  U  C <font color="Black">o 9 31 1 01:26, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The name of the theme song from ECW used to be "Bodies" by Drowning Pool. Do you know what the new theme song from ECW is? AdamDeanHall (talk) 21:51, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * It's in ECW's article! Also, as Truco said: WP:FORUM!!! Gavyn Sykes (talk) 22:28, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * As Truco and Gavyn said this is not a forum, so please don't ask questions on the article, post SUGGESTIONS to make the article better.  N i  m <font color:"black">i  T  i <font color:"blue">z <font color:"light red">e 16:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

First commentators
On the very first SmackDown it was Jim Ross and The King, as stated here. Should this not be mentioned in the commentators section? --Shazza (talk) 02:33, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Since it's a one time thing, it's more of a trivia thing than anything else. Mshake3 (talk) 20:09, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Title
I moved the page to WWE SmackDown! because the "friday night" has been dropped. I was going to move it to WWE Smackdown because the old title violated WP:MOSTM (like the article WWE Raw) but it wouldn't let me.  wwesocks   04:38, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Well actually they use the "friday night" name alot. Look here, they call it "Friday Night" SmackDown!. Also before you make a move like this, please discuss before you do so. T r  U  C <font color="Black">o 9 31 1 04:43, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Would you please consider renaming the page "WWE SmackDown!"? The reason why I am asking you to do this is because the "Friday Night" was dropped from the title. AdamDeanHall (talk) 23:32, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Hmm, quote from the comment above " they use the "friday night" name alot. Look here, they call it "Friday Night" SmackDown!."-- T r  U  C <font color="Black">o 9 31 1 23:37, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Why do people keep saying the Friday Night part has been dropped? The only thing that has changed is the logo. '''That's all! Nothing else!''' Mshake3 (talk) 05:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * But Raw is nearly always refered to as Monday Night Raw on air, but the article is still named WWE Raw. Same as ECW being refered to as ECW on SciFi on air, but the article being named 'Extreme Championship Wrestling (WWE)'. The other articles are named after the brand, not the show, so it should change to 'WWE SmackDown!' or 'WWE Smackdown' (if you want to stay in the guidelines) accordingly.RatzaChewy (talk) 17:07, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The guidline you refered to actually says it is a judgement call with words like SmackDown since it could otherwise be used as two words Smack Down with a space. LessThanClippers (talk) 19:39, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Hmm if we are to follow what they are called by WWE on the above link that I posted, we should rename the ECW article to ECW on Sci Fi, because in the results its says "On ECW on Sci Fi, Ric Flair....etc." Because in that link they call RAW simply Raw, thus we calling it WWE Raw, they call SmackDown!, Friday Night SmackDown!, thus we calling it WWE Friday Night SmackDown!, and they call ECW, ECW on Sci Fi, but for some reason we just call it ECW. In my view, the articles of Raw and SmackDown! read more like television shows and ECW reads more like a brand.-- T r  U  C <font color="Black">o 9 31 1 20:54, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Folks, think about this for a second. Outside of a new logo, has anything changed with the way the show has been promoted, both in WWE, on the CW, and beyond with the switch to HD? Mshake3 (talk) 00:06, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Nope. And Mshake I am agreeing with you 110%. T r  U  C <font color="Black">o 9 31 1 00:11, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Why are people ignoring the comment by RatzaChewy. It is absolutely correct. I will state it again and read it it's the truth They rarley refer to it as Friday Night SmackDown! anymore and if they do it doesn't matter because it is not in the graphics. It is exactly just like WWE Raw being called Monday Night Raw on air. So why is the WWE Raw article not called WWE Monday Night Raw?. The brand is Smackdown, not Friday Night SmackDown just like the brand ECW on there website refering to it as ECW on Sci Fi. I don't think there is any reason to not change it. (Also when it's changed there should be no explination mark or a capital D. Because that is violation of Wikipedia: MOSTM. Which is like WWE Raw not being called WWE RAW.) Thanks  wwesocks   22:58, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, they almost alway Friday Night SmackDown, only the logo dropped it. WWE.com and the announcer still say FRS. It is not like RAW because the website says just Raw and the only person who regularly calls it by the old name is JR. Also having it "SmackDown" instead of "Smackdown" is not even close to being a MOSTM, unless you think WrestleMania and SummerSlam are violating it too (hint: none of them are).  TJ   Spyke   01:06, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

What about the exclaimation mark?  wwesocks   06:38, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * None of the logos use the exclamation mark anymore, including the Friday Night one on the website, so it's safe to say that it should be dropped. Once again though, we still need to decide whether or not it should be SmackDown or Friday Night Smackdown. RatzaChewy (talk) 19:13, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Move protection
I have move protected this page for 1 month per WP:PROTECT because of the recent move-war. The renaming debate should proceed through WP:RM and this talk page. Please remember that the move button is for uncontested moves; if a name is contested a consensus should first be acheived on the talk page or at WP:RM. Repeatedly moving a page due a naming dispute is highly disruptive. Of course, protection can be lifted early if a clear consensus emerges or the issue is resolved at WP:RM. CIreland (talk) 01:24, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Citing SmackDown's move to MyNetworkTV
I have tried several times to cite MyNetworkTV as the new home for the program. However, a member of the project has removed the submission and has told me not to submit the information. At first, this member stated that the project had reached a "consensus" that the new network shouldn't be cited in the "Original channel" section of the article, but no consensus was found. I feel that it would be highly informative to cite MyNetworkTV as the new network. I hope that this conflict can be resolved, and even more so, I hope that the submission can remain in the article, being that it is completely, 100% factual. Thanks. Bat86 (talk) 10:25, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

I wanted to add a slight revision to my last comment on here. I want to apologize if anyone saw my opinion on this matter as offensive or hostile. I tend to get a little passionate about what I feel is right. So if you sense any hostility in my argument in the previous discussion, please take it with a grain of salt. I just want to inform. Thanks again. Bat86 (talk) 10:50, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * No, per WP:CRYSTAL, we are not a newsite, this is an encyclopedia, the move won't be added until it occurs. News, such as the announcement of the move is all that should be noted in the article.-- T r  U  C <font color="Black">o  -  X  18:11, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually since the move has been officially announced by both MyNetworkTV and the WWE it technically doesn't fall under WP:CRYSTAL. Future speculation and unverified claims fall under WP:CRYSTAL. Smackdown's move to MyNetworkTV is verifiable due to various first and third party sources. Since the move has been officially announced it should be included in the article as it does not violate WP:CRYSTAL. Here is a bit from WP:CRYSTAL that is relevant to this discussion: Individual scheduled or expected future events should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place. The move is varifiable by sources, it is certain to take place at this point. MyNetworkTV has already scheduled Smackdown for Fridays as part of their tentative schedule. So the move can be noted in a nutshell as it does not violate WP:CRYSTAL.  ♪♫Al ucard   16♫♪  18:13, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Well the move is already noted in the article, what more do you want to add??~ S R  S ~ 20:10, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

New Zealand
Hey, in New Zealand we're about a day ahead of the U.S, so lets say there's a SD/ECW House Show over here in NZ on a Wednesday night, then when the hell are they supposed to do the SD/ECW taping in U.S or where ever? Samrulz123 (talk) 08:51, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Foley is the new smackdown color guy, so says WWE.com
Mkay then. Tried to edit it, but I fucked up the table, Someone fix it for me, ok?
 * Fixed. Thanks for updating that. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 19:35, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

No problem, sorry for fucking it up so badly. Still new to this whole thing. =P Herotastic (talk) 20:07, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Don't worry about it. :) We all make mistakes early on (and later as well). Gavyn Sykes (talk) 21:29, 27 April 2008 (UTC)