Talk:WWE Tribute to the Troops

Cena vs. Jericho
It's obvious Cena won.--Curtis23 (talk) 02:17, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Dates
Shouldn't the dates be added to when the shows were taped?

2012
I know that this isn't a discussion forum, but I was just wondering... In 2012 all the troops will return to The United States. So would the Tribute to the Troops stop than? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.95.239.239 (talk) 19:43, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

I think by then there will probably be another global wrong-doer to smite MrZoolook (talk) 22:28, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

2010 table is messed up
I have tried twice to edit it, both times the preview was fine, but my edits were not saved to the page. If people really must copy and paste an old table to make life easier in creating a 2nd one... they might consider emptying the old data before saving the changes... MrZoolook (talk) 22:17, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Split off results to its own article
Hi there. I would like to propose that the results section be split off to its own list article titled List of WWE Tribute to the Troops results. The reason I propose this is that the results section is getting too long to be contained in the main article and, IMO, needs it's own article dedicated to the results as the event shows no sign of stopping after this year's event.  CRRays Head90  | #RaysUp 22:32, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't know. The results are the most significant part of a wrestling show. They're what happened. It'd be odd to omit something so fundamental from a main article. Doesn't look particularly long to me. Two swipes on the trackpad gets me to the bottom. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:33, 1 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Support - indeed it is getting long and it's just a click away even when moved, Hulk. starship.paint  ~ ¡ Olé !  23:52, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * A click away in an article which suggests the results had notability independent of the events where they occured. If that were true, it wouldn't be right to also mention the main events in the body here, further shrinking this small article. Money in the Bank ladder match is more of what I'd call "long". InedibleHulk (talk) 20:44, 3 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Support - 10+ years and the results are long enough for this article to exist. Stephen&#34;Zap&#34; (talk) 02:20, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Oppose, per above. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:44, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Oppose, we just move content to another article and begin to repeat content across the two articles with nothing new added. What is the point of that? MPJ  -US 20:16, 17 May 2015 (UTC)