Talk:Wages


 * Wages -> Wage -- Delete because it's a redundant and unnecessary plural redirect. All pages linking to  Wages  have been edited to point to  Wages  instead, except for the user page User:Mike martone@yahoo.com/Taxonomy DDC 300, the purpose of which I cannot discern and which also links to many many (many) other nonexistent pages.  The use of simple plural->singular redirects (where XXXs will work instead) clutters the wiki and encourages sloppy linking. Chris 19:45, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are literally thousands of plural redirects on Wikipedia and setting a precedent to delete them would be foolish. This one is particularly useful, since "wages" is a common form of the word "wage" and not obviously thought of as a plural. &mdash; David Remahl 20:44, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. The above reasoning is exactly right. Rlquall 20:47, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Economists tend to talk about wages in the plural. - RedWordSmith 05:21, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep; please read the section, above. &bull; Benc &bull; 09:20, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * OK. All y'all win.  :)  I reverted it back.  Chris 19:51, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)