Talk:Wake Up and Escape from the Citadel/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 23W (talk · contribs) 04:21, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Will take (again). Expect a review in the week or next week. 23W 04:21, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

@: Reviewing this now since I'm going on break until January. The merge looks good, but here are some comments:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Lead is way too long at four paragraphs, should be shortened to at most two per WP:LEADLENGTH (I know other episode articles have three, but even those are looking too long).
 * I merged it into three. How does it look now? I know it's still a bit long, but considering this is two episodes smashed into one article, I feel it makes sense.-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   21:46, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * All sources are reliable, and the self-published sources are acceptable per WP:ABOUTSELF.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Why did you get rid of the cultural references section of Escape from the Citadel? I thought that was cool, and it gave the io9 source.
 * Whoops. I just forgot to move it. It's there now.-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   21:46, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I could pick on the lengthy quotes in the reception section, but overall this looks nice. Can't really pick on the prose much. On hold for two weeks. 23W 01:00, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay. How's it look now?-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   21:46, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * @: Looks good! Though if you take it to FAC, I'd recommend reordering the lead and reception section for length's sake. Pass. 23W 04:10, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I could pick on the lengthy quotes in the reception section, but overall this looks nice. Can't really pick on the prose much. On hold for two weeks. 23W 01:00, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay. How's it look now?-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   21:46, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
 * @: Looks good! Though if you take it to FAC, I'd recommend reordering the lead and reception section for length's sake. Pass. 23W 04:10, 25 November 2014 (UTC)