Talk:Wakoklon Heelel Thilel Salai Amailon Pukok

Date
The reference for the date has a part in English that acknowledges that no chemical analysis has been carried out. There is a part in an Indian script that I cannot read. However Puya (Meitei texts) says:
 * Saroj Parratt noted in 2005 that none of these Puyas were yet to be dated by professional historians or subject to serious textual-critical scrutiny. Consequently, she criticized the tendency of local authors to treat puyas as reliable sources in their reconstruction of Manipuri history. Scholars have noted that puyas had been forged by Meitei nationalists to support their reinvention of history and tradition.

so I doubt the dating in the article. -- Error (talk) 08:42, 8 April 2024 (UTC)