Talk:Wakoklon Thilen Salai Amailon Pukok Puya

These texts exist, but there are hardly any references on them. A Manipur user is spamming these articles with no references. Apparently, there is a nationalist dispute on whether these manuscripts are old (18th century) or fakes made in the 20th century. They became the basis of a number of proposed Meitei scripts in the 1960s.

This blog-post appears to give some context:
 * ''The Differences between Puya Wakoklon Heelel Thilel Salai Ama-ilon Pukok and Puya Wakoklon Thilel Salai Amailon Pukok - by Wangkhemcha Chingtamlen
 * '' The first Puya, Wakoklon Heelel Thilel Salai Ama-ilon Pukok was kept and preserved by L. Songkhup Koireng and his family of longa Koireng since 18th century and was handed over to a group of Meetei Nationalists and followers of the Sanamahi Religion of Kangleipak on 17/10/1970 (Saturday). The group received the Puya was “Khwai Meetei Thoukal Langkal Malup”. This Puya was possessed by this group at first and then lastly the Puya was possessed by “Mannaba Apunba Marup” most probably upto this day.
 * ''The second puya, Wakoklon Thilel Salai Amailon Pukok was possessed by Ahal-Ibungo Late Thokchom Thoukachanpa of Sagolband. In about 1960, the Puya was printed in Bengali scripts by late Thouka Chanpa

Apparently, the titles Wakoklon Heelel Thilel Salai Amailon Pukok and ''Wakoklon Thilel Salai Amailon Pukok refer to two two distinct manuscripts with some differences:
 * ''the Exclusion or Non-inclusion of the Kanglei Era Founder Maliyapham Palcha, King of Kangleipak, further creates a great suspicion in the minds of the readers in the Facts of Genuineness of the Wakoklon Thilel Salai Amailon Pukok Puya.

I am afraid that until somebody can cite secondary literature on this, we will be limited to simply stating that these texts exist. This cannot be more than a short paragraph at Meitei literature based on the minimal referenced information we have at this point. dab (𒁳) 09:51, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * - moving page is not necessary when there is 2 PuYas with different content.

Former is original and latter is Frabicated. Awangba Mangang (talk) 10:29, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) The one with Heelel was written in Meetei mayek.
 * 2) The one without Heelel was written in Bengali script.