Talk:Waldorf Stories

I changed the description of Roger's flashback in the plot summary. It originally read that Roger had a flashback of how he first brought Don into the firm; I changed it to read that he had a flashback of Don hounding him for a job. I thought the flashback deliberately left it ambiguous as to whether or not Roger ever did actually hire Don. We see Roger, very drunk, still refusing to give Don a job at lunch; then we see Don show up the next morning and tell Roger that he hired him the previous day, something of which Roger has no memory. Certainly it wouldn't be above Dick Whitman to lie like that. Even if someone else doesn't see the flashback as being quite as open-ended as I do, I would still argue that my own description limits itself to what actually appears onscreen (Draper persisting in trying to get a job from Sterling), whereas the original summary is reporting a moment that does not actually show up in the episode (Sterling hiring Draper). Binabik80 (talk) 04:17, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I guess your edit removed an apophasis from the plot summary, although it may be ok to include it if later episodes confirmed that that is, in fact, what took place. Cla68 (talk) 23:31, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

A Note Concerning an External Link
I am writing about an addition I made to the external links for Season 4 and Season 5 of Mad Men which was automatically reverted by your bot. These links are from Kritik, the official weblog of the Unit for Criticism & Interpretive Theory, a recognized institute for cultural studies at the University of Illinois. The Unit for Criticism's multi-authored series of posts on Season 4 and Season 5 of Mad Men is the offshoot of a series of events including a symposium and Duke University Press book on the same topic. Each blog is authored by a recognized expert in cultural history, media studies and/or literary studies. Please do not remove this link as it does comply with Wikipedia policy and guidelines. We would be delighted to answer any questions you may have. 192.17.134.9 (talk) 20:18, 13 December 2012 (UTC) I am writing about the addition above that was reverted again. We are not in violation of copyright issues. Please send us any questions you may have about the links we are making to the official weblog Kritik.128.174.194.84 (talk) 22:18, 17 December 2012 (UTC)