Talk:Wales Millennium Centre/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * Starting GAreview.Pyrotec (talk) 10:09, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

On Hold
I'm putting the GA review review On Hold for two reasons. Pyrotec (talk) 20:10, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) The article it is not stable, it is being substantially altered.
 * 2) There are Copyright considerations, some of the paragraphs are straight copy and pastes from web sites used as references; and this is not being acknowledged.

The article has been stable now for a week or so and the "copyright problems" appear to have gone away (mostly overenthusiastic use of text from web site(s)), so I'll restart the GA review.Pyrotec (talk) 19:12, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

GA review
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Congratulations, I'm awarding this article GA-status.Pyrotec (talk) 19:12, 13 March 2009 (UTC)