Talk:Walkodile

Neutrality in question
Article needs to be rewritten from a neutral point of view. It's obvious that the writer despises the subject of the article - which does not fit Wikipedia guidelines.

Nice dig at fat people with the "obesogenic" reference, too. That footnote is not up to Wiki standards either. 90.157.234.124 (talk) 18:44, 18 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Agreed, the majority reads more like a thinly-veiled rant than a Wikipedia article. --Earin (t) 09:22, 19 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I've reverted the article to the version previous to the addition of all that... stuff. If the editor who added it is interested in promoting his/her views on topics like obesity and over-protection of children in the UK, I'm sure they can find an article to do so. This is not it, unless a specific and well-sourced criticism of this product along those lines is provided to back up the claims. The material amounted to little more than a thinly-veiled attempt to hijack a subject to promote a biased point of view. Criticism and negative information in product and corporate articles are encouraged and meant to provide balance, not attack or disparage the subject, or serve as a rant platform. § FreeRangeFrog croak 01:02, 21 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Fair enough - we learn. Fullerteethunion (talk) 10:28, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:23, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Walkodile with its inventor, Elaine Stephen MBE.jpg