Talk:Wallace Craig

I felt that everything in the article was relevant to the article topic however I was distracted by grammatical issues such as excessive use of commas and run on sentences. These issues caused some confusion but can be easily fixed with some rewording. I would have liked to see sub sections - education, work, contributions to ethology, etc. I believe having the information better categorized would make the article easier to read and comprehend. The article does not have any frames that appear heavily biased however there were a few choice words that should be changed as they suggest the presence of an opinion such as "in retrospect". The article seems to focus heavily on Craig's education and where he worked/taught but seems to lack information regarding his research and contributions to the field of ethology. Though some information is mentioned, the article does not go in depth with the who/what/when/where/how's of his research. This article does not have references embedded in the text however there are references listed at the end. Due to this, it is not known what information was taken from what source. The links that do work contain relevant information to the article but only one of the working links is from reliable sources. The talk page of this article contains no comments or suggestions. There are many scholarly articles regarding Wallace Craig and his work, supplemental information for this article could be extracted from the following links: http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.2307/1536346 http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/211646 Yellow Martin (talk) 21:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)