Talk:Wallachian Revolution of 1848

Good article review

 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Hmm, military history. Something I've never really reviewed or looked at before. However, I must say it looks good and should be of Featured quality in a short time. By all means, try for Featured Article Candidates. This article does pass Good Article quality as it meets the requirements. Mitch 32contribs 23:24, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Ethnic Cleansing by Avram Iancu and his forces
Does anyone have english data about this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Edipqe (talk • contribs) 11:57, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I have already answered on another page, so please stay focused. I also see absolutely no sense in having this discussion here - neither the controversy nor the sources have any relevancy on this page. Dahn (talk) 12:03, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't understand. Where do they have relevancy then, if not on this page? --131.188.3.21 (talk) 18:07, 9 May 2009 (UTC)