Talk:Wallkill Valley Rail Trail/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  intelati  talk 01:10, 17 November 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

One of the best sourced and detailed articles I have read
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Excellently sourced, and written. But the first paragraph of the lead is alittle confusing. Is the extention apart of the trail it self, or am I misreading that.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * No problems, Most sentences have references.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Nice background of the railroad's history :)
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * No problems
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * None that I see
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Nice variety of pictures, all free, and they all add nicely to the article
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Not now, but after the rewrite of the lead, the article is ready.
 * I'll rework the lead paragraph immediately. --Gyrobo (talk) 01:14, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Done. Truth be told, the lead was the last thing I worked on. I'm going to leave the references, though, because some claims (such as the bridge being the "most awesome part" of the trail) may be contentious. --Gyrobo (talk) 01:28, 17 November 2010 (UTC)