Talk:Wandering Son/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: -- Cirt (talk) 19:39, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Successful good article nomination
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of September 2, 2010, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: Yes, enough for GA, but going forward would suggest a peer review, as well as soliciting help from previously uninvolved copyeditors.
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout.
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: Good job including adequately fleshed out subsections, Production, Release, Reception, however perhaps going forward, the Reception subsection could be expanded a bit more.
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Neutral, NPOV presentation, matter-of-fact wording, good here.
 * 5. Article stability? No major issues upon inspection of article edit history, or article talk page history and discussions.
 * 6. Images?: One image used, appropriate fair use rationale given on image page. Checks out okay here.

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— -- Cirt (talk) 19:39, 2 September 2010 (UTC)