Talk:Wang Laboratories

Feels like an essay
I've read the article, and made some major changes to it. I've removed some of statements that sound like an opinion or a point of view on the article, to make the article more neutral and less essay-like. I have also added a split suggestion to make a new article called History of Wang Computers. If anyone has ideas to improve the article, discuss here.

Sincerely, Thenewright22 (talk) 10:29, 28 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Split what? There is only the history. Wang is defunct. 🇺🇦  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 06:48, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I removed the error, but the article is still excessively long, mainly because of statements that make this article feel like an essay. I have already started fixing the article by removing unverifiable, vague statements, adverbs, or irrelevant information.
 * Sincerely, Thenewright22 (talk) 06:59, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your improvements. I had hazy memories of this company and came in to read the article, and apart from being able to delete one request for an additional source (the cited source had the information requested), got sucked down a rabbit hole of reading and looking for independent high quality sourcing. The article is enjoyable and readable, but not yet encyclopedic. I'd hate to see all of the content vanish, but it really lacks sourcing. Holmwood (talk) 22:45, 9 June 2023 (UTC)