Talk:Warlugulong/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 20:31, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: one found and fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:36, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:38, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * I wondered if the artcile would benefit from the use of Infobox painting? This is not a GA requirement.
 * In the section The painting two successive sentences start with "While". It would be better to avoid this.
 * ...it was auctioned by Sotheby's... Was this in London or New York? Or in Australia?
 * Otherwise, prose is fine and meets MoS standards.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Online sources check out and are reliable. I found no evidence of OR.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * One detail is missing. What medium is the painting in?
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * One image used with a suitable rationale and caption.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * On hold for seven days for the issues above to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:57, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for addressing these issues so quickly. I am happy to list this as a good article, congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 10:43, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * On hold for seven days for the issues above to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:57, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for addressing these issues so quickly. I am happy to list this as a good article, congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 10:43, 24 November 2010 (UTC)