Talk:Warner and Swasey Observatory/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:09, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * I made some copy-edits for clarity. The 'Lede needs expansion - it shoul summarize the entire article.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * There are many dead links. I fixed what I could with WP:CHECKLINKS.  Overall the referencing is entirely inadequate.  All that is currently covered is the discoveries made by the observatory.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * OK, We need more refernces to the history and equipment of the observatory. On hold for seven days. Major contributors and projects will be informed. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:33, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I think everything was fixed. Ruslik_ Zero 15:14, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, all seem fine now, thanks for your hard work. Keep GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:22, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * OK, We need more refernces to the history and equipment of the observatory. On hold for seven days. Major contributors and projects will be informed. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:33, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I think everything was fixed. Ruslik_ Zero 15:14, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, all seem fine now, thanks for your hard work. Keep GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:22, 23 August 2009 (UTC)