Talk:Warrant for Genocide

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 13:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

See also section
Wikipedia articles follow a certain format. Please explain how the items in "see also" contribute to book description).

As for your revert, I have explained my edits in edit summary :rm "see also" : no additional info about the book". You did not explain why you disagree with my edit. You also reverted my other formatting edits. Why? - Altenmann >t 19:26, 13 October 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) You didn't edit. You effectively Reverted by Deletion without discussion.
 * 2) As to your challenge regarding the issue being, I'll assume WP:Good faith on your part. The subject of this Article and Book is the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Does that prove to you that the topic is in fact Controversial? --Ludvikus (talk) 19:33, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * This is not how wikipedia works. the tags are placed oinly real issues arise among wikipedians. Virtually all political topics are controversial. We tag only those which generate abnormally high level of contention among wikipedians. - Altenmann >t 20:00, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * In this particular case, the topic of the article is a scholarly book. I fail to see why this book is controversial. It does not matter that it writes about a controversial topic. Unless present any evidence of controversy regarding this particular wikipedia article, the tag will be removed. - Altenmann >t 20:03, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

All the explanations required is in the Template to the right

 * Hope you will be more cautious and consider restoring what you've Deleted or Reverted? --Ludvikus (talk) 19:40, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't see any answer to my edit summary. We are not to solve riddles here. Please explain your reasons in plain, short, and simple words. - Altenmann >t 20:00, 13 October 2009 (UTC)