Talk:Warren Zevon on the Late Show with David Letterman in 2002/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 06:20, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Unusual to see an article on one interview on one late night talk show, but the sources show clear enduring notability and significance. (Criteria marked are unassessed)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * c. (OR):
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * There's really no getting around this non-free image, and it has an NFCC.
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Only minor copy adjustments and this will be ready to go.
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * There's really no getting around this non-free image, and it has an NFCC.
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Only minor copy adjustments and this will be ready to go.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * There's really no getting around this non-free image, and it has an NFCC.
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Only minor copy adjustments and this will be ready to go.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Only minor copy adjustments and this will be ready to go.
 * Only minor copy adjustments and this will be ready to go.
 * Only minor copy adjustments and this will be ready to go.

Copy changes

 * It is known for the humor that Zevon used throughout the interview, and for his quip that the terminal diagnosis was a reminder to "enjoy every sandwich". The comma is unneeded because there is only one subject in the whole sentence. See User:Sammi Brie/Commas in sentences. You can also use ", as well as" to keep the comma.
 * Zevon hoped to promote the album on an episode the Late Show Missing an "of"
 * The same outlet ranked the episode as one of the best late-night TV moments from 2002–2013, and separately at number five on a list of "most profound moments" in the Late Show with David Letterman's history. The comma isn't needed there either, but you can do "...2002–2013 and, separately, at...", which would probably be better.

Spot checks
I went ahead and found ProQuest IDs for each of the non-linked references: 4, 5, 8, and 12. All of them also check out on quote reproduction and accurate representation.


 * Hello ! I've made the requested changes and thank you for the suggested edits. I used both of them. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 03:27, 15 May 2023 (UTC)


 * On Friday, I actually found myself in a sandwich place with a big sign saying "Enjoy Every Sandwich". After just having done this, I'm not so sure that's a coinkydink... Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 03:56, 15 May 2023 (UTC)