Talk:Washington State Route 168/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: – CG Talk 20:22, 25 December 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * "Forrest Roads" in RD.
 * Fixed. --Admrboltz (talk) 00:23, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * No reference for the final sentence of RD.
 * Doesn't really need one, look at any map to see any detour. --Admrboltz (talk) 00:23, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * An image of the area would be nice, but not necessary for GAs.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Just fix the two comments and its all good. Merry Christmas! – CG Talk 20:22, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks all good. Pass. Merry Christmas! – CG Talk 06:52, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Just fix the two comments and its all good. Merry Christmas! – CG Talk 20:22, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks all good. Pass. Merry Christmas! – CG Talk 06:52, 26 December 2010 (UTC)