Talk:Washington State Route 173/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 01:14, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

I'll review this. I'll try to get to it tonight because I won't be on much tomorrow or Saturday. – TC N7  JM  01:14, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Lead
 * "(SR 173)" SR 173 should be bolded, but not the parentheses.
 * "a 11.86-mile-long" a → an since the first syllable of "eleven" is a vowel sound.

Route description
 * "The 2-lane street" Write out the number two.
 * NHS info?
 * Not part of NHS, so it doesn't need to be there.

History
 * "The Brewster Bridge was completed in June 1928 as the roadway was first codified in 1931" I don't think as is the right word here. Maybe change it to and or with the route being codified in...
 * Not once do you give the exact year for the rebuilding of the Brewster Bridge. Is it not available?
 * Not available. 1976 is earliest ref referring to a rebuilt bridge.

References
 * On second thought, you should probably shorten Refs 17 and 19 with hidden text

All other sections are fine.

Final verdict
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: Just a few minor errors, and I can pass it. – TC N7  JM  01:47, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: Just a few minor errors, and I can pass it. – TC N7  JM  01:47, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * Taken all suggestions and implemented them.  Sounder Bruce  02:20, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
 * It would still be nice if you added in there that it isn't part of the NHS, but since that's mainly optional, I won't hold up the review for that small of an issue.

Congrats! – TC N7  JM  02:24, 1 February 2013 (UTC)