Talk:Washington State Route 22/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Excellent description of the route.
It has an excellent description of the route. Reviewer: Allforjesus2 (talk) 19:27, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

I do not disagree with the outcome of this review, but in the sake of completeness, I will do a full review of the article to confirm this.  Imzadi  1979   →  22:20, 21 November 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * There are some minor copy edits needed to clear up the prose. I've made them myself rather than list them here.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * As stated above, I agree with the outcome of the review, if not necessarily the process to arrive at that outcome. As such, I'm affirming the passage of the article.  Imzadi  1979   →  22:51, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * As stated above, I agree with the outcome of the review, if not necessarily the process to arrive at that outcome. As such, I'm affirming the passage of the article.  Imzadi  1979   →  22:51, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
 * As stated above, I agree with the outcome of the review, if not necessarily the process to arrive at that outcome. As such, I'm affirming the passage of the article.  Imzadi  1979   →  22:51, 21 November 2010 (UTC)