Talk:Washington State Route 230/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Imzadi 1979  →   20:14, 18 February 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

DAB and EL are good.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * I made a few minor edits, but the prose was sound.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * No issues here.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Images would be nice, but for an unbuilt road, it would be kind of impossible unless a current photo of where road would run is added or a map is created off WSDOT planning documents.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Nice job. With a few minor edits I applied, the article meets the criteria.  Imzadi 1979  →   01:48, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Nice job. With a few minor edits I applied, the article meets the criteria.  Imzadi 1979  →   01:48, 19 February 2011 (UTC)