Talk:Washington State Route 292/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 15:22, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the ✅ tag to state when something is addressed.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Lede

 * Sheep Creek - Am I to assume this is a river? Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:28, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
 * It's a small stream and not likely to meet notability requirements, hence why I've left it unlinked.

General

 * Should probably state the full name of the road on the first use in body. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:31, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Added.
 * WSDOT isn't used again in the body. No need to acronym Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:31, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Added a later use.
 * $1.3 million needs conversion to todays money. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:31, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Added.
 * A few of your citations have an error - this is because url-status is used without a archive-url. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:31, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Not sure which citation is throwing up those errors, as the two citations using url-status both have archived URLs.  Sounder Bruce  05:07, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Review meta comments

 * I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski  (talk • contribs) 15:22, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review. I think I've addressed everything.  Sounder Bruce  04:38, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Happy to promote - I'm getting someone to look at a script/bot to make the passing of GANs a bit more streamlined. They'll be doing the close. As I know you are trying to get this one passed before the end of the WikiCup, drop me a ping if this doesn't happen in the next two days, and I'll promote manually. :) Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 16:24, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
 * It doesn't seem to have gone through.  Sounder Bruce  06:03, 26 April 2022 (UTC)