Talk:Washington State Route 308/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 02:55, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

After the Slam Dunk Contest. – TC N7  JM  02:55, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Route description
 * I don't think on is the best adjective in the first sentence. Maybe with?

Final verdict
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: Good job! Just this one thing. – TC N7  JM  02:00, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Passing the article! – TC N7  JM  04:52, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall: Good job! Just this one thing. – TC N7  JM  02:00, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Passing the article! – TC N7  JM  04:52, 17 February 2013 (UTC)