Talk:Washington State Route 433/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: – CG Talk 23:38, 23 November 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Some concerns: Thanks, – CG Talk 23:38, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Can you merge the AADT and NHS paragraphs together?
 * --Admrboltz (talk) 23:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks good! – CG Talk 00:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The paragraph in the history about the Seattle–Portland Bicycle Classic could be moved to RD, since its not a historical event.
 * --Admrboltz (talk) 23:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks good! – CG Talk 00:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Could you expand the history to include the bridge's history?
 * The article is about the highway, not the bridge. If the reader wants to know more about the bridge, they can click on the link. --Admrboltz (talk) 23:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Moving the shields to history would be more relevant.
 * You're right, but the bridge article is lacking in information. ;) – CG Talk 00:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * While I agree, it would smush the text of the History section between the images & the infobox, which is not recommended in the MOS. --Admrboltz (talk) 23:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Now I see it, good point. – CG Talk 00:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Can you include an image of the bridge or highway from the bridge deck?
 * --Admrboltz (talk) 23:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks good! – CG Talk 00:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)