Talk:Wastebasket taxon

Paraphyletic?
Are these generally paraphyletic? - Samsara contrib talk 13:52, 1 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Indeed "paraphyletic" is a good hint for expanding this somewhat crabbed and ungenerous stub. "Examples of wastebin taxa include Simia, Rhynchocephalia, Carnosauria, Megalosaurus and Thecodontia." If each of these were expanded upon, showing the process by which such taxa were originally arrived at, that would be a start. Simia for one thing may not immediately bring "simians" to mind. --Wetman 07:21, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Another needless Americanism
This article has been moved from Wastebin taxon to Wastebasket taxon, with the edit summary '"Wastebasket taxon" in slightly more common use that "wastebin taxon"' The editor, no one will be surprised to hear, is "a graduate student working on my MS Thesis in Biology at San Francisco State University." Well-intended, doubtless. --Wetman 10:27, 8 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, just look at the Google tests:


 * "wastebasket taxon" OR "wastebasket taxa" -wikipedia 232 hits
 * "wastebin taxon" OR "wastebin taxa" -wikipedia 106 hits
 * "dustbin taxon" OR "dustbin taxa" -wikipedia 49 hits
 * The numbers speak for themselves as far as frequency of useage. Yes, Americanisms are more common than Britishisms – that's just the way the language has gone. Peter G Werner 10:41, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Form taxon
I don't see how the concept of a form taxon is a type of wastebasket taxon -- and I don't think it should redirect here. It's conflating the issue. — John.Conway 15:15, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Invertebrates
The comment on invertebrates contradicts Invertebrates, which classifies non-vertebrate chordates as invertebrates (as one'd expect from the etymology). Also, saying that they share no distinctive ancestry suggests that they're polyphyletic, which is incorrect - the last common ancestor of all invertebrates was an invertebrate. 85.8.12.78 (talk) 11:27, 12 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Smith609  Talk  12:36, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Invertebrates seem to be irrelevant in this article, because they were never regarded as a taxon at all. Stas (talk) 22:57, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Linguistics
What about linguistics? Nilo-Saharan and Austroasiatic are notorious cases. Sagotreespirit (talk) 18:47, 21 September 2019 (UTC)