Talk:Wasteland Angel/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sjones23 (talk · contribs) 23:44, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello there. Here are a few things that may need to be improved before I pass or fail this GAN:
 * The date formatting in the citations may need to be consistent.
 * IGN is a work published by News Corporation, so you may want to include the publisher in the IGN sources as well.

I will check on the other issues later. Good luck, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 23:44, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * [ Done]. --Odie5533 (talk) 03:57, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

I'm back. Anyways, here are some things that I would like to go over.


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The prose is well written, but should the lead be expanded to two or three paragraphs if possible?
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * All the sources seem to be good enough. All dead citations were replaced.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * No edit wars occuring here.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * All of the images have FARs and have appropriate use with suitable captions.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I will check to see if this article passes or fails if possible.
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I will check to see if this article passes or fails if possible.

Hope these help. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 20:15, 16 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I expanded the lead and split it into 3 paragraphs: [] --Odie5533 (talk) 23:35, 16 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Also, I think GameRankings might need to be added in as well to summarize the critical reception of the game. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 23:58, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * [ Done] --Odie5533 (talk) 02:31, 17 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I am passing this article as a GA. Good work! Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 16:45, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much for reviewing the article. WP:GAN has the final steps for finishing off the review. Thank you again. --Odie5533 (talk) 13:33, 4 February 2013 (UTC)