Talk:Wat Phra Kaew/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Paul 012 (talk · contribs) 07:21, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, but I'm going to have to quick fail this nomination. The prose is not particularly well written. The article contains numerous factual inaccuracies, and in-line citations to reliable sources are lacking. The coverage is unbalanced, giving too much detail on the Buddha statue (which has its own article) and too little on the architecture, history and importance of the temple itself. I don't see outstanding issues regarding neutrality and stability; media use needs to be adjusted to better comply with the MOS. This will require much more work before it's GA-ready. --Paul_012 (talk) 07:21, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

I've noticed that User:Sodacan has mentioned that he is working on a major revision of the article. I'd be happy to do a full review for that version—please consider re-nominating then. --Paul_012 (talk) 07:29, 12 September 2018 (UTC)