Talk:Wat Tyler Cluverius Jr./GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk • contribs • count ) 00:25, 14 September 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * As far as I know, Find-a-Grave is not a reliable source (see for instance this thread) and should be removed.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * No real issues with the article apart from the Find-a-Grave usage. Excellent work. Parsecboy (talk) 00:25, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, removed that. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:39, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright, looks good to me. Parsecboy (talk) 22:04, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * No real issues with the article apart from the Find-a-Grave usage. Excellent work. Parsecboy (talk) 00:25, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, removed that. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:39, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright, looks good to me. Parsecboy (talk) 22:04, 15 September 2011 (UTC)