Talk:Water resource policy

Rationale
It seems that water policy and regulation is quite disorganized here on WP. I think there is a role for an article on WRP as developed in US Europe and Japan and disseminated to global. I may be wrong. See talk. Geo Bard  Rap 02:57, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 one external links on Water resource policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110615051911/http://www.blm.gov/nstc/WaterLaws/california.html to http://www.blm.gov/nstc/WaterLaws/california.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100125234751/http://www.ccwa.com:80/chloramines.htm to http://www.ccwa.com/chloramines.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110615051911/http://www.blm.gov/nstc/WaterLaws/california.html to http://www.blm.gov/nstc/WaterLaws/california.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100726074309/http://www.epa.gov:80/owow/monitoring/ to http://www.epa.gov/owow/monitoring
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091201154918/http://www.nal.usda.gov:80/wqic/ to http://www.nal.usda.gov/wqic

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 00:30, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Water resource policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive {newarchive} to http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/waterrights/water_issues/programs/instream_flows/docs/not_wdm070111.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 09:06, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Water resource policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160303232426/http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/waterrights/water_issues/programs/instream_flows/docs/not_wdm070111.pdf to http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/waterrights/water_issues/programs/instream_flows/docs/not_wdm070111.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 19:05, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Reorganizing this article a bit
I started reorganizing the issues in water resource policy section. So far I've worked on environmental issues, but I'm also planning on making sections about privatization, water as a human right, and diplomatic issues. Eventually I'm planning on working on the Institutional Participants and Structural Constraints parts as well to add citations and make it less US-focused. If you have any more suggestions, let me know. Gggg2123 (talk) 21:08, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Link Broken for Reference 66
This site cannot be reached Brookewilder (talk) 08:16, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Reference 45 irrelvant
This website is not a relevant citation for this piece of information. A more specific citation or a link to a specific article within this website is required. The information cannot be verified using the current citation #45. Brookewilder (talk) 08:53, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Introduction Contains Biased/Opiniated Concluding Sentence
"Mitigation and updated water resource policies will require interdisciplinary and international collaboration, including government officials, environmental scientists, sociologists, economists, climate modelers, and activists."

The word "require" suggests that this is the only solution. This could be improved by rephrasing to "could involve" or "could require." As written this sentence excludes other possible methods or mitigation or implementing policy.--Brookewilder (talk) 09:14, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Reference 66 Broken Link
Reference 66 links to a website that can no longer be found. This information cannot be verified and requires a similar source or removal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brookewilder (talk • contribs) 09:16, 25 April 2022 (UTC)