Talk:Water supply and sanitation in Nicaragua

Private vs. Decentralize
Hi Mschiffler. Thanks for the great article. I had a couple questions. Since I am new to this stuff can you tell me what "Decentralization", "Privatization", "Reform" in the context of this article. I think it could be added to the artivel to help claify for laypeople

Thanks for clarifying my edits from yesterday.--Agrofe 13:12, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Decentralization in the context of public utilities means that responsibility for service provision is transferred from a national-level public utility such as INAA to municipal or provincial/regional/municipal utilities or directly to municipalities. This is different from the issue of whether the utility is publicly or privately managed. Private sector participation or Public-private partnership means that the private sector takes over certain (but not all) responsibilities related to service provision, which could range from the simple contracting-out of certain functions such as meter reading or billing (service contracts) to full concessions where the private partner manages the entire operation, but ownership still remains public. All this is different from privatization, when assets are sold to the private sector and ownership is transferred. Privatization in water and sanitation is very rare - it occurred only in England, Wales and Chile. Reform can mean all or some of the above, depending on the context.--Mschiffler 14:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks, now I am clearer (makes sense). The article implies reform (which I understand to be change) and decentralization are intrinsicly better (though it could be the way I am reading it). If I am reading it correctly, should we be making this implication here? Is decentralization better? --Agrofe 15:13, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:NI C$500 2002.JPG
Image:NI C$500 2002.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for bringing this up. Image removed.--Mschiffler (talk) 02:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Global Poverty and Practice
— Assignment last updated by MayaLis1 (talk) 19:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello everyone. Upon reading this article, I am planning on adding to the service and provisions section of the Wikipedia article. In particular, I want to expand the discourse to include recent policies, legislations, and discourse that have significantly impacted water distribution, particularly in rural areas, often leading to privatization and a bias toward urban water supply. These changes will highlight the evolving landscape of water governance and its implications on equitable access to water resources, with a focus on the growing trend of privatization and urban-centric water allocation strategies. Please let me know whether you have any thoughts on these edits! Riyaaarul (talk) 23:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Adding to Service Provisions Section
Hello everyone. Upon reading this article, I am planning on adding to the service and provisions section of the Wikipedia article. In particular, I want to expand the discourse to include recent policies, legislations, and discourse that have significantly impacted water distribution, particularly in rural areas, often leading to privatization and a bias toward urban water supply. These changes will highlight the evolving landscape of water governance and its implications on equitable access to water resources, with a focus on the growing trend of privatization and urban-centric water allocation strategies. Please let me know whether you have any thoughts on these edits! Riyaaarul (talk) 23:30, 23 April 2024 (UTC)