Talk:Waterford Township, New Jersey/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 16:01, 27 March 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

 The article has too many issues that would take more than a week to fix. In addition, it appears the nominator is not a major contributor to the article. Therefore, I will have to fail the article. The article may be renominated once all the issues are addressed.  Dough 48  72  16:01, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The article has many short one sentence paragraphs.
 * External links should not be included in the prose.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * There are large sections of the article that are unreferenced.
 * There are several dead links in the article, check the tool.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Why is the mayor missing from the infobox?
 * The lead is too short and does not provide an adequate summary of the article
 * Many sections, such as the Geography section, seem incomplete.
 * The article is missing many sections that make a complete article about a place, such as History, Climate, Crime, Economy, Arts ans Culture, and Notable residents. See Teaneck, New Jersey for an example of what this article should look like.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Some pictures of the township would be nice, but not required.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: