Talk:Waterway E40

Untitled
Does anyone else feel this article has been written in a way to give a solely negative slant to this project? Particularly the 15 points later down in the article which seem to veer into original research in some of the points, using the phrase "it doesn't make economic sense" over and over again? I feel this section could be consolidated at the very least as it reads as a 15 point manifesto against the project currently — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:3901:1AD0:309A:9A5A:7A8:D25C (talk) 11:15, 14 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Yes, this article seems very one sided. 188.22.178.4 (talk) 21:29, 25 July 2022 (UTC)